Return to Contents in this Issue

Original Article

 

Histopathologic Changes in Two Mouse Models of Asthma

 

D Olmez,1 A Babayigit,1 G Erbil,2 O Karaman,1 A Bagriyanik,2 O Yilmaz,1 N Uzuner1

1 Department of Pediatric Allergy, Dokuz Eylul University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
2 Department of Histology and Embriology, Dokuz Eylul University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
3 Department of Experimental Animal Laboratory, Dokuz Eylul University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey

J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2009; Vol. 19(2): 132-138

 

 Abstract


Background: No studies to date have compared mouse models of asthma by evaluating airway histopathology.

Objective: To compare 2 such models by studying chronic histopathologic changes of the airways using light and electron microscopy.

Methods: Twenty-one male BALB/c mice were divided into 3 groups: a nebulization group sensitized via an intraperitoneal injection of 10 μg ovalbumin on days 0 and 14 and exposed to 2.5% aerosolized ovalbumin 3 days a week over the subsequent 8 weeks; an intranasal group sensitized via 2 intraperitoneal injections of 100 μg ovalbumin on days 0 and 14 and administered an intranasal dose of 500 μg ovalbumin on days 14, 27, 28, 29, 47, 61, 73, 74, and 75; and a control group that received nothing. Airway histopathologies were evaluated.

Results: Basement membrane, epithelium, and subepithelial smooth muscle layer thicknesses and mast and goblet cell numbers were significantly higher in the nebulization group than in the control group. With the exception of mast cell numbers, these parameters were also signifi cantly higher in the intranasal group than in the control group. On comparing the intranasal and the nebulization group, goblet cell numbers were significantly higher in the former and mast cells in the latter.

Conclusion: Both models replicated all the structural parameters of asthma except for mast cell numbers in the intranasal group (no significant difference with respect to the control group). Our findings do not provide suffi cient evidence that one protocol is superior to the other. Larger studies are needed to compare different asthma protocols.

Key words: Mice. Asthma. Remodeling. Nebulized ovalbumin. Intranasal ovalbumin