Background:
Hymenoptera venom
immunotherapy (VIT)
is a safe and
effective approach
to insect sting
allergy. However,
after
discontinuation,
relapses can occur
in some patients,
especially those
with a high
occupational risk,
and they may need to
prolong VIT
indefinitely. In
order to improve
adherence, we
propose extending
the interval between
injections of
maintenance VIT (MVIT).
Objective: To
evaluate the safety,
effi cacy, and
patient acceptance
of a 3-month
interval between
MVIT injections in a
group of
Hymenopteraallergic
patients who are
occupationally
exposed to insect
stings.
Patients and Methods:
We included 72
patients with severe
systemic reactions
to Hymenoptera
stings. MVIT was
administered for 4
years at intervals
increasing up to 3
months and then
continued for a
further 2 years.
Patients were
informed of the risk
of relapse after
discontinuation and
of the need for
indefinite treatment
at 3-month
intervals.
Results: During the
3-month interval
maintenance phase,
only 235 local
reactions (17.8%)
were observed in 17
patients. Sixty
patients experienced
125 field re-stings
and only 1
experienced a
systemic reaction
with generalized
urticaria.
Conclusions: The
study confirms that
the conventional
MVIT interval of 4
to 6 weeks can be
extended to 3 months
in most patients
with no adverse
events, while
maintaining safety
and efficacy,
improving adherence,
and guaranteeing
safe continuation of
professional
activity.
Key words: Venom
immunotherapy.
Patient acceptance.
Safety. Efficacy.
3-month interval.
Maintenance.
|