Previous Page  31 / 80 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 31 / 80 Next Page
Page Background

Epidemiology of Anaphylaxis in French Emergency Departments

J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2019; Vol. 29(5): 357-364

© 2019 Esmon Publicidad

doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0348

Introduction

Anaphylaxis is an acute, severe, life-threatening generalized

or systemic hypersensitivity reaction that requires rapid

recognition and treatment [1]. It may present as very different

combinations of symptoms, and apparently mild signs may

unpredictably progress to fatal shock. The recognition of

anaphylaxis is hampered, in part, by variability in diagnostic

criteria. Consequently, administration of appropriate treatment

is delayed, thus increasing the risk of death. Anaphylaxis is a

recognized cause of death in all age groups.

Although this condition is considered a priority public

health issue in the world allergy community, epidemiological

data on morbidity and mortality remain suboptimal. The

frequency of anaphylaxis in the emergency department

(ED) has been reported to range from 0.04% to 0.5% of

visits [2-10]. This remarkable variability is related to factors

such as differences between populations and EDs, difficulty

recognizing at-risk and anaphylactic patients, and the

methodology applied to calculate rates.

In 2017, Tanno et al [1] reported a local incidence rate

of 32 per 100 000 person-years in hospitalized patients

in Montpellier, France [11] and a national mortality rate

of 0.83 (0.80-0.88) [12]. However, there are currently no

epidemiological studies on the morbidity of anaphylaxis in

French EDs.

Ascertaining how anaphylaxis is diagnosed and treated

nationally and worldwide is an important preliminary step

towards the development of public health strategic action

plans to identify and resolve key issues. We proposed a 1-year

multicenter epidemiological study in 7 French EDs covering a

population of 953 552 inhabitants in order to identify key areas

for change and to support ongoing national and international

efforts for better diagnosis, management, and prevention of

anaphylaxis.

Methods

Data Sources and Case Definition

Ours was a descriptive study using ED data routinely

reported to French institutional administrative databases.

The French public hospital structure uses a system of

coding alongside the length of hospital stay to determine

the chargeable cost of care per patient for purposes of

reimbursement. The coding system used is the World Health

Organization (WHO)

International Classification of Diseases

(

ICD

), currently

ICD-10

[13]. Coding is based on review of

case reports by professional coders, who take into account

diagnosis, procedures, and other events reported by the care

team. The data are submitted to be included in national health

statistics and are used for research and planning. Since French

public health institutions serve as references for patients in the

regions where they located, patients are generally referred to

these hospitals.

In this study, we evaluated data from 7 EDs in institutions

from the University of the Lorraine urban region between

January and December 2015. Data were retrieved in January

2016. Lorraine is an administrative area in the northeast of

France with 32 public healthcare institutions of different

complexities.

Of the 202 079 ED admissions recorded during the year

2015, we accessed all consecutive files in which the primary

solo en el 32,4% de estos casos. En total, 323 casos, el 57,9%, se remitieron posteriormente para un estudio o evaluación alergológica

(después o durante la hospitalización) y el 17,3% recibió una receta de adrenalina autoinyectable.

Conclusión:

Según los resultados de este estudio, existe una necesidad urgente e imperiosa de mejorar los planes de salud pública

respecto al reconocimiento y tratamiento de la anafilaxia. Los problemas clave detectados en este trabajo, señalan el camino de la toma de

decisiones e implementación de acciones de mejora, nacionales e internacionales, para una mejor atención de los pacientes con anafilaxia.

Palabras clave:

Anafilaxia. Urgencias. Epidemiología. Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades (CIE). Tratamiento.

Figure.

Flow chart showing patient selection and inclusion based on the

International Classification of Diseases

.

Total population = 953 552 (2015)

Number of cases related to direct

anaphylaxis codes = 46

(T78.0 = 10; T78.2 = 36;

T80.5 = 0; T88.6 = 0;

T63.4 = 0)

Number of cases related to

indirect anaphylaxis codes = 277

(J38.4 = 5; J39.3 = 7; J45.0 =2;

J45.9 = 2; L23.9 = 1;

L50.0 = 26; L50.9 = 46;

R60.9 = 1; T63.4 = 1;

T78.3 = 5; T78.4 = 181)

Total admissions/year from 2015/01/01

to 2015/12/31 in the 7

EDs included = 202 079

Total cases selected based on the

95 ICD-10 anaphylaxis-related

codes = 4817

Exclusions after clinical

validation (incomplete

files, incompatibility with

anaphylaxis diagnostic

criteria, doubtful

cases) = 4494

Total cases clinically selected as

anaphylaxis = 323

358