Omalizumab Response Profile and Management
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2019; Vol. 29(5): 338-348
© 2019 Esmon Publicidad
doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0323
342
biologics [39], although it is also important to consider their
cost. In this context, data on the relative value of high-dose
antihistamines compared with alternative treatments should
be clear and rigorous. Given the proven efficacy and safety
of omalizumab, it is our expert opinion that clinicians should
consider using this medication to shorten and simplify
the gradual treatment approach that is typically used in
antihistamine-refractory CSU patients [13].
Omalizumab for Treatment of CSU
The efficacy and safety of omalizumab for the treatment
of CSU has been demonstrated in several phase 3 pivotal
trials, namely, ASTERIA I [14], ASTERIA II [3], and the
GLACIAL trial [15,40] (Supplementary Material, Table 2).
The improvements observed in all efficacy variables at
week 12 were still present at week 24 in the ASTERIA I and
GLACIAL trials [14,15]. Overall, the findings from these trials
support the efficacy of omalizumab over 6 months.
Pivotal trials also confirm the favorable safety profile of
omalizumab. The authors found that the incidence rate for
adverse events, the severity of those events, and the incidence
of serious adverse events were all similar in the treatment
group (regardless of the omalizumab dose) and placebo
group [3,14,15].
Importantly, in real-world observational studies, the
efficacy and safety of omalizumab in CSU patients was
similar or even better than in pivotal trials [20,21,41-43]. Of
particular interest is the retrospective, descriptive analysis
of 110 CSU patients treated with omalizumab at 9 Spanish
hospitals [1]. The authors found that 81.8% of patients had a
complete or significant response to treatment, with only 7.2%
not responding to treatment. Moreover, 60% of the patients in
that study remained asymptomatic while receiving omalizumab
alone (that is, they were able to discontinue antihistamine
therapy), and no serious adverse events were reported.
Predictors of Response to Omalizumab
It would clearly be beneficial, if possible, to identify the
clinical predictors of response to omalizumab. Knowledge
of these predictors would also enable physicians to provide
patients with more accurate information about the expected
course of the disease. The findings of the 3 aforementioned
pivotal trials show that the response pattern is dose-dependent.
Thus, the standard dose of 300 mg/4 wk results in a higher
percentage of complete response (UAS=0) or good response
(UAS≤6); moreover, higher doses resulted in faster response
and more sustained disease control [44]. In the pooled analysis
of the trials, disease control was good (UAS7 ≤6) or complete
(UAS7=0) in 58% and 40% of patients, respectively, 12 weeks
after administration of 3 × 300 mg doses of omalizumab [40].
However, disease control was not achieved in all patients
over that period. An analysis of the 3 pivotal trials revealed
that of the patients with uncontrolled urticaria (UAS7 ≤6) at
week 12, 58% subsequently achieved disease control between
weeks 13 and 24 [44]. The mean number of weeks necessary to
obtain a score ≤6 or 0 on the UAS7 was, respectively, 6 weeks
and 12-13 weeks. These data show that some patients respond
quickly to omalizumab, whereas others respond more slowly.
Patients who respond within 4-6 weeks could be classified as
"fast responders" and those requiring 12-16 weeks of treatment
could be considered "slow responders" [45] (Table 2).
According to a recent study [43], the predictors of a
favorable response to omalizumab are as follows: (
1
) diagnosis
of CSUwith chronic inducible urticaria, (
2
) no prior treatment
with immunosuppressive drugs, (
3
) older age, (
4
) shorter
duration of symptoms, (
5
) absence of angioedema, and (
6
)
negative histamine release test. Over 85% of patients who
present these characteristics achieve a complete response to
treatment. In addition, a negative histamine release test result
and absence of angioedema both predict a good response
to omalizumab and correlate with previous trial results
showing that a positive autologous serum skin test (ASST)
result is associated with a longer duration of and more severe
CSU [46,47]. In addition, patients in whom angioedema is a
significant component of urticaria tend to relapse faster after
treatment is discontinued [10]. Neither the patient’s gender nor
their smoking habits have been shown to influence the efficacy
of omalizumab [43]. Asignificant reduction in D-dimer values
following treatment with omalizumab in patients with elevated
baseline D-dimer levels has also been shown [48].
Deza et al [49] recently demonstrated the predictive
value of baseline basophil expression of high-affinity IgE
receptors (FcεRI) for response to omalizumab. The authors
found that FcεRI expression levels in CSU patients are usually
significantly higher than in healthy controls. Moreover,
after the first treatment with omalizumab, FcεRI expression
levels drop immediately, while UAS7 scores decrease and
UCT scores rise. Deza et al observed that baseline FcεRI
expression with a mean fluorescence intensity of less than
4743 in peripheral blood basophils is a significant predictor
of nonresponse to omalizumab (100% sensitivity and 73.2%
specificity).Another study showed that the baseline expression
level of FcεRI was lower in slow responders than in fast
responders [50]. Gericke et al [51] recently reported a slower
response to omalizumab in patients with a positive result in the
ASST or basophil histamine release assay, thus suggesting that
patients presenting with anti-IgE or anti-FcεRI IgG respond
more slowly than those presenting with IgE autoantibodies
against autoantigens (eg, TPO, IL-24) [51].
Table 2.
Patient Profile According to the Response to Omalizumab
Fast responder
Patient who responds in 4-6 weeks
Slow responder
Patient who responds in 12-16 weeks
Complete responder – Sustained UAS7 score = 0
– Absence of symptoms
– Absence of angioedema
– Requires neither salvage medication
nor H
1
- antihistamines
Good responder
– Sustained UAS7 score = 1-6
Partial responder
– Partial improvement in baseline
UAS7, with scores ranging from 7-15
Nonresponder
– No change in baseline UAS7 score
and sustained scores >16
Abbreviations: UAS, Urticaria Activity Score; UAS7, Urticaria Activity
Score 7.