Kuruvilla M, et al.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2019; Vol. 29(5): 349-356
© 2019 Esmon Publicidad
doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0320
Ocular Symptoms Deriving From
Neurogenic Inflammation
The importance of neurogenic inflammation is suggested
by the large trigeminal sensory innervation of the ocular
surface. Mast cell activation inAC results in overt stimulation
of polymodal nociceptors, which are responsible for burning
and stinging eye pain. Nasal provocation studies in AR
patients showed that TRPV1 and TRPA1 activators induced
immediate and more prolonged pain; during the pollen
season, provocations with TRPV1 activators induced itch as
well as pain [33]. In fact, in a recent series, 80% of patients
with symptomatic AC had no evidence of conjunctival
inflammation, while over half had nasal inflammation only. It
was postulated that neurogenic mediators could explain this
disconnect between ocular symptoms (especially itching) and
detectable inflammatory conjunctival infiltration [34].
Emerging evidence suggests that the underlying allergic
and neural inflammatory pathways can interact. Histamine-
induced itching via H1 receptors on conjunctival sensory nerve
fibers requires activation of TRPV1. Histamine-independent
pruritic pathways, as in IL-31–induced itch, also directly
activate TRPV1/TRPA1 sensory nerves in mouse models
of dermatitis [35]. Furthermore, leukotriene B4 (LTB4) can
activate TRPV1 and induce itching via interaction with LTB4
receptors on sensory nerves [36].
The activation of TRPV1 causes the release of
proinflammatory and pruritic mediators. It has been reported
that substance P levels are increased in tears of patients
with AC compared with healthy individuals, suggesting that
substance P may contribute to the pathogenesis and severity
of AC [37]. The concentration of substance P in tears has also
been found to be elevated at baseline in patients with seasonal
AC and vernal keratoconjunctivitis [38], with further increases
in substance P and CGRP documented after conjunctival
allergen challenge [39]. On the ocular surface, NGF has been
hypothesized to influence the immune response in AC [40].
A strong relationship has long been recognized between
AC and dry eye, with a large symptomatic crossover that
may reflect interrelated mechanistic characteristics [41]. Tear
film instability, a characteristic of dry eye, was also noted
to be more pronounced in children with AC [42]. Increased
inflammatory allergic cytokines are also associated with goblet
cell loss and tear volume insufficiency. Recent evidence has
further expanded the phenotypic spectrum of patients with
dry eye syndrome and implicated neuropathic pain in dry
eye pathogenesis. A significant body of physiological data
suggests that dry eye symptoms may be significantly modulated
by the nervous system [43]. However, our understanding
of neuropathic pain in dry eye remains incomplete, largely
because of limited access to tests that assess the function of
the ocular sensory-nociceptive apparatus.
Neurogenic Mechanisms of AC:
Implications for Management Approaches
The current mainstay of AC therapy includes topical
mast cell stabilizers and antihistamines, with variable and
limited clinical success possibly because factors other
than mast cells and histamine play important roles in
AC. Therefore, research into more effective treatments
is necessary. The simultaneous targeting of multiple
inflammatory signaling mediators might represent a more
promising treatment modality.
Addressing the neurogenic component of allergic
inflammation has been an active area of study. The
hyperreactivity phenotype of allergic sensitization can be
physiologically dissociated from the immune component,
and neural sensitization has been targeted in animal models
as well as in humans.
Murine models of allergic sensitization have provided
evidence of the anti-inflammatory actions induced
by the depletion of neuropeptides [25]. Mice that had
undergone surgical denervation of cutaneous sensory
nerves demonstrated dampened inflammatory responses
after induction of anaphylaxis and mast cell activation.
Similar responses were obtained following pretreatment with
selective substance P and CGRP antagonists [44]. Recently,
treatment with olopatadine and naphazoline hydrochloride
was shown to reduce conjunctivitis in mice via effects on
NGF [45].
A prominent candidate pathway is TRPV1, which has
been described in several forms of allergic disease. Vagal
sensory neurons in TRPV1 can dramatically affect airway
hyperreactivity. Several trials have explored therapies that
target TRPV1-expressing neurons as a strategy for the
management of allergic diseases. This has been supported
by murine models, where ablation of TRPV1 expressing
vagal neurons abolishes airway hyperreactivity, even in
the presence of a full lung inflammatory response [46]. In
yet another mouse model, the use of a TRPV1 antagonist
alleviated atopic dermatitis–like symptoms as evidenced by
suppression of itch behavior and acceleration of skin barrier
recovery [47]. In another murine model of AC, ocular itch
was significantly attenuated in TRPA1 and TRPV1 knockout
mice, implicating both TRPA1 and TRPV1 in the genesis of
allergic ocular itch [48].
Clinical trials exploring the potential for neuronal-targeted
therapies in patients with allergic inflammation are in their
early stages. However, in subjects with allergic rhinitis,
an intranasal TRPV1 antagonist alone or combined with
fluticasone propionate did not improve allergen-induced
symptoms [49]. Similarly, symptoms appearing after exposure
to cold dry air in patients with nonallergic rhinitis did not
Improve with this therapy [50].
These findings may indicate that TRPV1 may be a
facilitating ion channel—but not a key mediator—for itch
and other allergic symptoms, suggesting that other receptors
expressed in C fibers, such as TRPA1, might be involved in
their development.
On the other hand, a recent study of patients with
nonallergic rhinitis revealed overexpression of TRPV1 in
the nasal mucosa and increased substance P levels in nasal
secretions at baseline, with reduced symptoms and reduced
levels of nasal hyperreactivity following topical capsaicin
treatment [19]. The authors suggest that the ablation of
the TRPV1–substance P nociceptive signaling pathway
353